The Case
for Testing Teachers


Dr. Roberta R. Schaefer


At the college level, the practice of awarding tenure has some merit if we want to ensure that diverse points of view are presented without penalty.

Governor Paul Cellucci recently called for the testing of mathematics teachers because of the extremely poor math performance from the 8th and 10th grade students on the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS). In 1999, 40 percent of all 8th graders and 53 percent of all 10th graders failed the math portion of MCAS. Beginning with the class of 2003,
students who fail the math or English language arts test will not be eligible to receive a high school diploma. The governor's latest request was a modification of his 1999 proposed legislation that all currently employed public school teachers be required to pass a test in basic literacy and communication skills and one in the subject they teach in order to continue teaching. I believe that there is justification for administering a subject matter test (which can also be used to judge the literacy and communications skills of the teacher) as a component of the recertification process.
Many contend that the mere suggestion of administering such a test to those who have been teaching many years amounts to "teacher bashing." In other words, the proposal wrongly impugns the trustworthiness, reputation, and competence of public school teachers. It has further been questioned why teachers should be singled out to take such a test for recertification when none is required for other professions.
I believe that there is a persuasive answer to these objections. If doctors, lawyers, or accountants fail to keep up with developments in their fields or are otherwise incompetent, they won't get patients or clients, and they are always subject to dismissal for incompetence. Massachusetts' public school teachers, however, are granted tenure, usually after three years of teaching in the same school. When tenure is coupled with union protections, it becomes almost impossible to remove them. (A recent successful attempt to dismiss a teacher cost the Worcester Public Schools about $100,000 in direct and indirect costs.)
At the college level, the practice of awarding tenure has some merit if we want to ensure that diverse points of view are presented without penalty. But college teachers normally cannot be awarded tenure without six years of full-time service. And college teaching typically requires the completion of a doctorate in one's field, which is a more demanding educational program than
the requirements for certification in public school teaching.
Since the case for awarding tenure to public school teachers after only three years of service is considerably less obvious than the case for tenure at the college level, public school tenure deserves to be regarded as an important "fringe benefit" not commonly available in other professions. To prevent the abuse of this fringe benefit, a recertification test may be essential.
Stephen Gorrie, the president of the Massachusetts Teachers Association, disagrees. At a Board of Education meeting, he argued that a teacher's competence in terms of literacy and subject matter should be judged through performance evaluations, not through a test. He denied that a recertification test should be required, even if a teacher's students have consistently underperformed over a period of several years. Mr. Gorrie argued that an appropriate professional development program would remedy the problem of inadequate teacher performance. Yet in most school districts, the principal and superintendent presently are denied the authority to prescribe specific courses that a teacher should take. However, proposed changes in recertification regulations will grant principals authority to approve a teacher's professional development plan.
In brief, the purpose of a subject matter test is to determine whether a teacher has, in fact, kept up with his or her subject matter. Given the unacceptable failure rates on the math test, we owe it to our students to find out why.

By Dr. Roberta R. Schaefer


Dr. Roberta R. Schaefer is the executive director for the Worcester Municipal Research Bureau, and has taught for many years in the Political Science Department at Assumption College. She holds an M.A. and Ph.D. in Political Science from the University of Chicago.