Public School Teachers
Are Scapegoats

 


Hank Naughton '82


In 1993, we saw the enactment of the most sweeping piece
of educational legislation in the history of our Commonwealth. The Education Reform Act was a demonstration of our commitment to the education of our children and our need to improve in those areas where our system is deficient.

Since 1993, we have annually seen an increase in educational funding to municipalities pursuant to the Education Reform Act. Most recently, we have implemented a means by which to determine the
success, or lack thereof, of the components of the Education Reform Act in the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) exams.
Unfortunately, the initial results of the MCAS examinations were not encouraging in light of the efforts made to comply with the Education Reform Act. The Cellucci administration suggested that the reason for the poor results may be the competency level of our public school teachers. Consequently, the governor has proposed across-the-board testing of veteran teachers in the Commonwealth. Coincidentally,
the proposal came at a time when
the then Lieutenant Governor Cellucci was seeking the corner office on
Beacon Hill.
As an ardent supporter of public education in Massachusetts and through-
out the country,
I believe that subjecting our veteran teachers to a competency examination is not only unnecessary but also grossly unfair. To date, the teachers of Massachusetts have never been required to take a competency examination, because their performance has been evaluated by internal measures of their respective school districts, as promulgated through the state's Department of Education.
A more appropriate "question" to ask is why the administration's first response
to poor MCAS results is to deliberately suggest that the teachers of this Commonwealth are incompetent and to immediately recommend examinations. While there very well may be individuals who are not performing effectively in this state, means to determine such situations can and have been effectively utilized without the need of an examination.
More importantly, to target veteran teachers who have dedicated their professional lives to educating our children is an indication of an unwillingness to address what may be a deeper problem. Perhaps we should consider such avenues as lowering the number of students per classroom, continuing to appropriate increases in state local aid to municipalities, maintaining an up-to-date and challenging curriculum, and support of remediation programs geared to the needs of individual school districts.
Furthermore, we must continue to emphasize the importance of homework and home support of our school children. The opportunity to apply the daily educational lessons to homework is essential to the learning process. Accordingly, we must be mindful of limited free time in today's professional world where typically both parents are working to support the family.
For the aforementioned reasons, I believe that an examination is the easy way out of a problem which is certainly not limited to the efforts of public school teachers.

By Representative Harold P. Naughton

Representative Harold P. Naughton Jr. has been in the Massachusetts House of Representatives since 1995. He graduated from Assumption College in 1982, and holds a law degree from Suffolk University Law School.